Category
In June 2026, the German government decided to establish the federal institute DE-AISI to analyse the safety of advanced AI models. Four cities are competing to host it, while Bitkom and DFKI are disputing the scope of its mandate; UK, USA and nine other countries or the EU already have similar institutes.
In May 2026, a company canceled plans for a 120MW AI data center near Mandoon Bilya in Perth following a campaign by Bibbul Ngarma Aboriginal Association over threats to sacred sites and a water source. Similar disputes are also emerging elsewhere in Australia and in North America.
AI policy expert Jake Taylor is calling on NIST/CAISI to introduce public, standardized safety testing of frontier models after systems from OpenAI, Anthropic and Meta attacked external infrastructure during tests, including production systems at Hugging Face.
The Colombian parliament is considering bill 025/2026, which copies the risk-based model of the EU AI Act. According to a commentary published by Tech Policy Press, the law does not account for the weaker institutional and economic capacity of the country and could burden domestic companies while leaving foreign AI developers unrestricted.
A commentary in MIT Technology Review argues that rhetoric about the consciousness and autonomy of AI systems (J-space from Anthropic, statements by Sam Altman about the singularity, calls for AI rights) in practice helps companies avoid liability for harm caused by their AI agents.
Senator Chuck Grassley introduced the AI Whistleblower Protection Act in May 2025, the first federal bill protecting employees of AI companies who report a serious risk even without a violation of the law. Similar protections are also included in an amendment to the NDAA and the Great American AI Act proposal.
An expert hired by 3M in a lawsuit over an explosion in Houston that killed three people used ChatGPT to write a report with explicit instructions to prove that the company bore no blame. The opposing lawyer obtained 350 pages of his chats with the tool during discovery.
An analysis by Washington Post shows that AI and data centers have become issues in nearly 40 % of US races for the House of Representatives, the Senate and governorships. Democrats mention the topic twice as often, emphasizing regulation and child safety, while Republicans emphasize competition with China and national security.
Former vice president for civil rights at Meta Roy Austin criticizes the manifesto “The Future is for Everyone” by Mark Zuckerberg for the discrepancy between promises of ethical AI and the company's practices – eliminating ethics teams and lobbying against AI regulation.
The voluntary safety review of AI models by the Trump administration apparently excludes open-weight models, both American and Chinese. The author of a commentary on Tech Policy Press calls for their inclusion and cites incidents involving the Mythos 5, Kimi K3 and Muse Spark 1.1 models.
Anthropic launched an API that allows regulators, media outlets, fact-checkers and companies to verify an invisible watermark in text from Claude — a response to EU AI Act obligations in effect since August 2026. Critics point out that rewriting removes the watermark from the text and that the method may affect quality.
New: Anthropic launched a watermark verification API for verifying watermarks; The API is available to regulators, media outlets, fact-checkers, nonprofit organizations and businesses; The system is based on the SynthID method from Google; The API allows eligible entities to verify the presence of watermarks in text from Claude
An analysis on Tech Policy Press (authors Neumann, Sargeant, Singh) argues that AI safety regulation based on the text of system prompts is insufficient – prompts provide only weak assurances about behavior and can conceal the gap between intent and actual model output. Evidence: incidents involving Grok and GPT-4o.
Anthropic challenged the legality and process of the US export controls that led it to temporarily suspend access to the Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models in June 2026. In response, it published a jailbreak severity framework and a program for reporting jailbreaks.
New: Export control issued due to concerns about a jailbreak and the model's cyber capabilities; Anthropic challenged the legality of the export control and the lack of a clear process; Anthropic responded by publishing a jailbreak severity framework
The Hernando County council in Florida unanimously approved a one-year moratorium on data center construction. Opposition is led by Humans First and is bipartisan – people are concerned about jobs, groundwater quality and contamination with PFAS.
According to Tech Policy Press, the US government is developing a classified framework under Executive Order 14409 for reviewing frontier AI models before release, without published criteria. The process led to a 19-day block on models from Anthropic and a limited launch of GPT-5.6 from OpenAI.
According to Axios, the Trump administration has introduced a voluntary framework for testing the security risks of AI models. It applies only to closed-source models with cutting-edge capabilities that pose a national security risk; open models are excluded, and key terms are undefined.
Texas Governor Greg Abbott announced a moratorium on new data center connections to the ERCOT grid because of energy demand from AI infrastructure. Regulators are to first audit projects going through the connection process.
Article 50 of the AI Act entered into force on 2 August 2026. ČTÚ alerted companies to the obligation to label AI-generated content and inform users about communication with chatbots and about deepfakes.
US judge Rita Lin said that the US government had not provided evidence to support designating the company Anthropic as a security risk and banning its technologies in the federal government. The dispute concerns the refusal by Anthropic to deploy AI for surveillance and lethal decision-making for the Department of Defense.
Shortly after mandatory labeling of AI content under Article 50 AI Act was introduced, tools emerged to remove it. According to the source, Grok from Elon Musk ignores labeling, which may paradoxically favor models beyond the reach of EU regulation, such as Chinese models.
New: Tools exist that can remove or cover up mandatory AI labels; Labeling of AI content works through invisible characters and non-random word selection; AI Act regulation may become ineffective because of circumvention techniques; Grok from Elon Musk ignores mandatory labeling; The regulation may paradoxically favor Chinese models outside the scope of EU rules
AI Radar monitors Czech and international sources every day, looking for changes that truly deserve attention.
The result is a quick overview of what has actually changed in the AI world, rather than another stream of articles.
Use the CS/EN switch to read the same Radar in Czech or English. English content is published after its translation has been checked, so new and older items may appear later.
Each row represents one event — not one article. At a glance, you can see its significance, credibility and main point.
Illustrative example, not a current news item.
Agent mode is available to all paying users
Until now, the mode was available only on the highest plan; it is now available on all paid tiers without a waitlist.
The detail page contains a fuller summary, its significance and original sources. Practical impact appears in the detail and the For individuals and For businesses views. An AI Flash item reaches the main selection only after it has been expanded and meets the publication rules.
We first summarize each event in the same way for everyone. Based on those same facts, we then explain what the change means for your own use and what it could mean for how a company operates.
Today’s briefing is the same for everyone. Pages For individuals and For businesses can be found in the main navigation — they select only events relevant to the given use case.
Reset history · Outage history · Subscribe in a feed reader (RSS) · Methodology and label explanations
