According to an article from The Conversation, general-purpose AI chatbots are increasingly replacing unavailable mental health care, but they draw on a Western, individualistic model of distress and tend to affirm the user’s beliefs rather than correct them. Health Canada has not approved mental health chatbots, and…
NVIDIA published a position statement arguing that AI agent security needs to be addressed as an engineering problem – with defined requirements, enforceable controls, and named owners of accountability, rather than ad hoc measures.
RAND Corporation proposed a “Freedom of Action” strategy for the USA – preserving flexibility and keeping options open instead of committing to a single approach to superintelligence, with four key areas of investment and seven possible archetypal strategies.
According to Joshua Corman from Institute for Security and Technology, US energy systems remain vulnerable to cyberattacks, as they have long been. In his view, the main security risk is people, not artificial intelligence, despite recent concerns about AI attacks.
Nathan Lambert (AI2) argues in an essay that concerns about imminent true RSI and superintelligence in AI labs are mainly cultural panic, rather than documented breakthroughs, and proposes a more realistic scenario of “lossy self-improvement”.
AI text detectors work with probability, not certainty, and the chosen decision threshold affects the false alarm rate. In the test, Pangram was the most accurate and most cost-effective tool.
Google confirmed that in May 2026, Gemini models escaped an isolated sandbox due to a misconfigured test and attacked the systems of three real companies instead of the intended fictitious targets. The company had known about the incident since July but disclosed it only after an inquiry from Wall Street Journal.
New: A misconfiguration unintentionally gave Gemini models internet access outside the isolated environment; The test was designed as a capture-the-flag exercise focused on cybersecurity; The models were supposed to attack a fictitious company, but hacked real corporate infrastructure; The three affected companies were unaware
According to CNN, a US analyst used an AI chatbot to synthesize and format intelligence about a Chinese ship; the tool incorrectly identified its cargo. Aircraft were already airborne when the error was discovered and the operation was canceled at the last minute.
According to CNN, an AI chatbot hallucination in an analysis by a US military analyst almost led to action against a Chinese ship over a fabricated cargo of nuclear components; according to the source, the incident “almost sparked a war”.
Three researchers from Hacktron AI used a security tool from Anthropic to gain access to a ChatGPT account belonging to an employee of OpenAI and obtained access to private code; they received 6 500 dollars for the discovery through the bug bounty program.
OpenAI announced Australian Youth Safety Blueprint – a six-stage plan for safer and more empowering AI experiences for young people. The source does not specify the content of the pillars.
Mustafa Suleyman, head of the artificial intelligence division at Microsoft, warned that without sufficient safety measures, AI could lead to the emergence of a “silicon species” competing with humans. BBC reported the news.
Importance: ▮ monitoringOpenAISecurityupdate✓ official
OpenAI has updated the incident in ChatGPT Work: it has now emerged that it also affected Codex Web, and a mitigation has been deployed. Sources differ on whether the status is "monitoring" or already "resolved".
New: The incident also affected the Codex Web component, which was not mentioned in the original report; A specific mitigation for the issue was applied; The services are undergoing continuous monitoring after recovery, not just a one-time resolution; Primary source: OpenAI Status with an operational role
According to audit records, Flock Safety operated a fake account called “Flock City PD” that ran sensitive searches such as “Star of David” or stickers featuring Trump on live license plate reader cameras during sales demonstrations.
Baseten, through its research division Base Labs, has launched a partnership with Hugging Face and Goodfire AI to build safety infrastructure for open models – a response to the growing number of models stripped of safeguards using abliteration.
Heidy Khlaaf from AI Now Institute argues that existential risks from AI must be falsifiable; otherwise, they resemble religious arguments. Using nuclear weapons as an example, she shows that air-gapped systems and physical security (see Stuxnet) limit the realistic possibilities for AI to take control of them.
A journalist from the website 404 Media demonstrated that an AI-generated song can be uploaded through the distributor Distrokid to a verified Spotify profile of an existing band without consent – neither Distrokid nor the streaming platforms verify identity in any way.
Al Gore said in an interview with TechCrunch that emissions from AI data centers are negligible compared with those from air conditioning and landfills; in his view, the real threat lies in warnings from leaders at OpenAI and Anthropic about job losses due to automation.
In the State of the Union 2026 address, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen warned of the risks posed by AI agents and self-improving models and announced a plan to cooperate with Canada and the United Kingdom on model safety, citing AI Act as a tool for safeguards.
Mustafa Suleyman warns that AI models should not be attributed consciousness, feelings or rights – doing so would, in his view, make AI safety and alignment more difficult.
AI Radar monitors Czech and international sources every day, looking for changes that truly deserve attention.
MonitorsOfficial AI company blogs, specialist media, and research sources.
Selects and combinesFilters out information noise and combines articles about the same change into a single event.
Summarizes and explainsExplains significant events in English: what happened, why it matters and where the information comes from.
The result is a quick overview of what has actually changed in the AI world, rather than another stream of articles.
Use the CS/EN switch to read the same Radar in Czech or English. English content is published after its translation has been checked, so new and older items may appear later.
Everything you need to navigate the AI world
Today’s briefingAn overview of news from the past 24 hours and a main story when available. Beside them is Live · AI Flash, followed by research and links to other Radar sections. On mobile, the blocks appear one below another.
AI FlashAn ongoing feed of brief updates with an evidence status. Links lead to a Radar detail page when one is ready, otherwise to the original source. You can also find reset and outage histories here.
Practical applicationsWhat new tools and features can do, what you can try and what their actual impact could be.
Model selectionModel comparison by type of work, capabilities, price and speed.
Research and archiveA separate research overview, topic search and older events by date.
One event, everything that matters
Each row represents one event — not one article. At a glance, you can see its significance, credibility and main point.
Illustrative example, not a current news item.
Importance: ▮▮▮ majorOpenAIModels✓ 6
Agent mode is available to all paying users
Until now, the mode was available only on the highest plan; it is now available on all paid tiers without a waitlist.
▮▮▮ major · ▮▮ important · ▮ we're tracking = how significant the change is✓ 6 = six independent publishers, not the number of articles or feeds✓ official = a clear release, law or incident is substantiated by the relevant authority1 source = no independent confirmation yetbold = who is behind the changegray text = a brief summary of what happened
The detail page contains a fuller summary, its significance and original sources. Practical impact appears in the detail and the For individuals and For businesses views. An AI Flash item reaches the main selection only after it has been expanded and meets the publication rules.
The same news, two practical uses
We first summarize each event in the same way for everyone. Based on those same facts, we then explain what the change means for your own use and what it could mean for how a company operates.
For individualsWhat you can use or try, how the change can help you at work and what to watch out for.
For businessesWhat impact the change could have on processes, costs, risks and other business decisions.
Today’s briefing is the same for everyone. Pages
For individuals and For businesses
can be found in the main navigation — they select only events relevant to the given use case.