Skip to content

Model comparison

Same task, different trade-offs.

We are not looking for an absolute winner. The comparison shows which model better suits your work, budget and required speed.

Models being compared

Model A OpenAI

GPT-6 Luna

Data from September 27, 2026
Published September 22, 2026

Simple tasks at low cost

A cost-effective option for clearly defined, repetitive tasks.

Model B Google

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Data from September 27, 2026
Published September 2, 2026

Documents, media and automation

Processes text, images, audio and video; the output is text.

Price, speed and usage

Costs
Model A · GPT-6 Luna

$0.10 input / $0.50 output per million tokens. Above 272 thousand input tokens: 2× input and 1.5× output.

Model B · Gemini 3.8 Flash

$0.75 input / $3.75 output per million tokens through December 31, 2026. From January 1, 2027: $1.50 / $7.50.

Speed
Model A · GPT-6 Luna

We have not independently measured speed on a comparable basis.

Model B · Gemini 3.8 Flash

We have not independently measured speed on a comparable basis.

Availability
Model A · GPT-6 Luna

OpenAI API

Model B · Gemini 3.8 Flash

Gemini API and Google AI Studio

Input length
Model A · GPT-6 Luna

1,050,000 tokens in total; output capped at 128 thousand tokens.

Model B · Gemini 3.8 Flash

1,048,576 input tokens; output capped at 65,536 tokens.

Inputs
Model A · GPT-6 Luna

Text and images → text

Model B · Gemini 3.8 Flash

Text, images, video, audio and PDF → text

GPT-6 Luna

Use when…

  • Text classification and brief summaries
  • Processing a large number of simple requests

Choose another model when…

  • For complex tasks, check whether the low price leads to more corrections.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Use when…

  • Analysis of documents, audio and video
  • Programming and multi-step business tasks

Choose another model when…

  • A different model is needed to generate images or audio directly.

Original sources

Open the reference materials for each model