Skip to content
worth noting Regulation and law

White House paused work on an AI regulatory agency following opposition from Trump and technology companies

only one source so far

The US White House halted work on a proposal to establish a regulatory body for AI lab self-regulation after David Sacks and Mark Zuckerberg lobbied President Trump against it.

According to Wired, Treasury Department and White House Office of Science and Technology Policy prepared a preliminary proposal to establish a regulatory body similar to FINRA, under which leading AI labs would self-regulate the development of frontier models. In August, however, technology leaders, including former Trump AI adviser David Sacks and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, learned about the initiative and, through a series of phone calls, persuaded President Trump to oppose the proposal. According to sources, work on the proposal was thus left in limbo, and the White House has not seriously considered any new regulatory initiative since then. According to sources cited by Wired, a text of nearly four thousand words by Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei on the risks of frontier AI also contributed to the president's opposition. Trump advisers viewed it as unnecessarily stoking fears, even though it represents a relatively moderate position within the debate on AI. Trump subsequently called AI safety concerns a hoax on Truth Social. Without leadership from the White House, regulation is left to Congress, which lacks unity. Although the bipartisan Frontier Act has the strongest support among lawmakers and some AI companies and would allow Commerce Department to place its own auditors at AI labs, with the ability to halt the development of a model posing a catastrophic risk, it has little chance of passing because of the lack of voting days in the House of Representatives before the midterm elections and divisions among lawmakers. There are also two competing proposals for a so-called kill switch, but technology companies have shown only limited interest in them.

What changed

Why it matters

Without a federal framework, regulation of frontier AI model development in the USA remains unlikely, prolonging the period in which labs operate without binding external oversight of safety risks. For AI companies, this means a continuation of the current situation without new obligations such as audits or reporting safety incidents.

Relevant practical impact

What this means

01

For a business

Companies developing frontier AI models in the USA, including Anthropic and Meta, continue to face no new federal regulatory framework or mandatory independent safety audit because the White House initiative was halted following lobbying by technology leaders.

Risks and compliance More business impacts →
AI bezpečnost Bílý dům Frontier Act politika USA regulace AI samořegulace

Check the original

Event sources

only one source so far · 1 publisher, 1 independent. We count feeds from the same owner only once.

1
Wired — AI section independent context · first detected Washington Won't Be Regulating AI Anytime Soon