Nvidia privately admitted the feasibility of tracking the location of AI chips
According to Congressman Bill Foster, Nvidia privately confirmed that it is technically capable of implementing the chip geotracking required by the Chip Security Act – despite the public position of the industry association SIA that such a measure is infeasible. The case is linked to an investigation into chip smuggling into China.
Nvidia representatives privately confirmed to Congressman Bill Foster (Democrat, Illinois, member of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology) that it is technically possible to implement anti-smuggling measures for chips as required by the Chip Security Act bill. According to Foster, they said this during technical meetings without any written confirmation – the response, according to him, was "sure, we can do that." This private admission goes further than any public statement by Nvidia on the matter.
The Semiconductor Industry Association, of which Nvidia is a member, has publicly opposed such measures; in March 2026 the association described chip tracking requirements as "novel, unproven, and potentially infeasible." At the same time, Nvidia already introduced the Fleet Intelligence tool in December 2025, which allows clients to monitor chip performance across different data centers and, according to the company's statement to Reuters, can indicate which country the chips are located in. Nvidia did not directly respond to questions about Foster's claim or about the possible use of Fleet Intelligence against smuggling, and described chip smuggling as a "negligible diversion" compared to the volume of computing power that China already has available from domestic sources.
The case is unfolding in the context of the resignation of Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and reports about his relationship with Alice Huang, operator of the Singapore-based company Megaspeed, which is under investigation for smuggling advanced GPUs into China; the investigation by the US Department of Commerce was, according to sources, halted after Nvidia's intervention. The Chip Security Act is one of three chip security bills being considered for inclusion in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) in the Senate, and the proposal envisions tracking chip location through inspections, sworn declarations, or a location signal when the chip connects (the so-called ping-based method, which an analysis by the Center for Security and Emerging Technology identified as the most cost-effective).
Foster plans to introduce stricter legislation in the new year that would establish mandatory licenses for operating advanced GPUs – a chip could only connect after verification of a valid license. According to Foster, the Nvidia case has increased political support among colleagues in Congress for pushing through geographic validation of chip location.
Why it matters
For policymakers and regulators, this is evidence that the technical capacity for chip tracking exists, which strengthens arguments for statutory obligations around GPU geotracking or operation licensing in the US. For companies in the advanced AI chip supply chain, it signals growing risk of future regulatory obligations to prove hardware location, or possibly the need for a license to operate it, which could increase administrative and operational costs.
Relevant practical impact
What this means
For a business
Companies operating advanced Nvidia AI chips may in the future face regulatory requirements for geographic tracking or licensing of GPU operation if the US Congress pushes through stricter rules; this increases compliance risk and operational burden for entities in the chip supply chain.
Risks and complianceCheck the original
Event sources
only one source so far · 1 publisher, 1 independent. We count feeds from the same owner only once.