Newly elected Congressman Scott Wiener plans federal AI regulation with a kill switch
Scott Wiener, author of California's SB 1047 and SB 53 bills, was elected to the US Congress to the seat vacated by Nancy Pelosi. He wants to push for a federal AI regulator with a kill switch, auditing, and whistleblower protections, citing METR's report on possible recursive self-improvement at Anthropic.
Scott Wiener, the outgoing California state senator, won a close race for the US Congress seat vacated by Nancy Pelosi. In his own words, he wants to play a key role in shaping federal AI policy in his new role.
Wiener is the author of California's SB 1047 bill, which Governor Gavin Newsom vetoed, and subsequently of the milder SB 53, which Newsom signed. According to the article, both bills inspired proposals for federal legislation. His campaign was supported with $3 million by Public First Action, an organization also funded by Anthropic — which drew criticism from his opponents, criticism Wiener rejects, saying it amounts to an attack on a candidate who actually got AI regulation passed.
Wiener advocates for the creation of a strong and flexible federal AI regulator (similar legislation was also proposed by Congressman Ro Khanna), testing and auditing requirements, whistleblower protections, and a kill switch mechanism. At the same time, he opposes a federal law that would broadly preempt existing state legislation. As a reason for urgency, he cites a report by METR, which commentators interpreted as evidence that Anthropic has achieved recursive self-improvement — that is, a state in which AI significantly contributes to its own development; this is an interpretation of the report, not a confirmed fact.
Wiener describes himself as only "cautiously optimistic" about Congress's ability to actually regulate AI, especially given President Trump's stance, who previously called the risks of catastrophic AI a "hoax." He names Senator Bernie Sanders as an ally on this agenda. The rest of the source article was not available.
Why it matters
This is a political signal, not enacted law: a newly elected congressman with a track record of passing AI legislation announces his intent to push at the federal level for a kill switch, auditing, and whistleblower protections for AI companies. For AI labs and companies operating in the US, this is a reason to watch whether similar proposals (e.g., from Ro Khanna) advance through the legislative process, as they could introduce new testing and reporting obligations.
Relevant practical impact
What this means
For a business
If a federal AI regulator with kill switch authority and audit requirements were to be established, it would affect the compliance obligations of companies developing or deploying advanced AI models in the US; for now, this is the political intent of one congressman, not enacted legislation.
Risks and complianceCheck the original
Event sources
only one source so far · 1 publisher, 1 independent. We count feeds from the same owner only once.