Meta says Muse Wonder models are intended to help with tasks in law, finance and health
Meta is now emphasizing the specialist knowledge of Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full for work tasks. It has yet to integrate them into Muse. Both models are available to Muse Code subscribers; only Muse Wonder is available through the API.
According to the AI Business article, Meta presents Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full as extending the capabilities of Muse for personal and work tasks, including law, finance and health. This is a claim by the company; deployment of the new models in Muse is still planned and is set to begin with subscribers. The Decoder article also reports that results on financial and legal tasks remained at the level of the predecessor or fell by up to two points.
Both models support a context length of one million tokens and accept text, images, video and audio. According to The Decoder article, Muse Wonder Full scored a total of 56 points on Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3 and Muse Wonder scored 52 points; the predecessor, Muse Spark 1.3, scored 48 points. The article describes the largest improvement as being in autonomous programming. According to Meta, Active Memory retains important information across conversations, while Active Focus helps the models keep working on difficult tasks and try different approaches.
Both models are available to Muse Code subscribers, and Muse Wonder is also available through Meta Model API. The sources differ on API access: the Wired article broadly promises this route for the new models, while the TechCrunch article clarifies that Muse Wonder Full will not be offered through the API. Articles in The Decoder and The Verge also describe access to Muse Wonder Full as being available only through Muse Code.
Using Muse Wonder through the API costs 4 USD per million input tokens and 20 USD per million output tokens. According to the AI Business article, a Muse Code subscription costs 5, 15, 50 or 200 USD per month, depending on the level of usage. These amounts are subscription prices, not token rates for Muse Wonder Full.
Why it matters
The different access requirements affect the choice for a specific task: Muse Wonder can be integrated into applications through the API, while Muse Wonder Full is tied to Muse Code. Claims of specialist knowledge do not in themselves demonstrate better results in law or finance; the measurements described show the greatest improvement in programming.
What was added since the original report
Verified updates
-
According to the company, the models extend the capabilities of Muse with specialist knowledge for law, finance and health.
-
Muse Wonder Full scored 56 points on Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.; Muse Wonder scored 52 points on the same index.; Both models support a context length of one million tokens.; Both models accept text, images, video and audio.; Performance on Terminal-Bench 4.0 increased from 33 to 57 percent compared with the predecessor.
- Muse Wonder Full scored 56 points on Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.
- Muse Wonder scored 52 points on the same index.
- Both models support a context length of one million tokens.
- Both models accept text, images, video and audio.
- Performance on Terminal-Bench 4.0 increased from 33 to 57 percent compared with the predecessor.
-
Muse Wonder costs 4 USD per million input tokens.; Muse Wonder costs 20 USD per million output tokens.; Muse Wonder Full is available only to Muse Code subscribers and will not be offered through the API.
- Muse Wonder costs 4 USD per million input tokens.
- Muse Wonder costs 20 USD per million output tokens.
- Muse Wonder Full is available only to Muse Code subscribers and will not be offered through the API.
-
The new article describes availability through the API and Muse Code as future availability, while the event lists it as current.; According to the company, the best version of the model is intended to power features across Meta platforms, including the personal agent Muse.
- The new article describes availability through the API and Muse Code as future availability, while the event lists it as current.
- According to the company, the best version of the model is intended to power features across Meta platforms, including the personal agent Muse.
-
Muse Wonder Full is available to Muse Code subscribers.; Meta plans to deploy Muse Wonder in the Muse agent for subscribers first.; Meta plans to develop specialized models for all Muse users.
- Muse Wonder Full is available to Muse Code subscribers.
- Meta plans to deploy Muse Wonder in the Muse agent for subscribers first.
- Meta plans to develop specialized models for all Muse users.
Two audiences, two different impacts
What this means
For individuals
A Muse Code subscriber can try both new models when writing software. Access to Muse Wonder Full therefore requires this service; API access alone is not enough.
For a business
When introducing Muse Wonder into development workflows, a company must account for separate costs for input and output tokens. According to analysts quoted in the AI Business article, integration with company applications and data handling remain key questions to address before deploying agents.
DevelopmentCheck the original
Event sources
confirmed by 4 independent sources · 5 publishers, 4 independent. We count feeds from the same owner only once.