Gemini Robotics 2.5 model achieved a 96% success rate in sorting parts in a pilot at Mercedes-Benz
Google DeepMind's Gemini Robotics 2.5 model achieved a 96% success rate in sorting metal parts with the Apollo 2 robot during a pilot deployment on Mercedes-Benz production lines in Hungary and Germany. According to the company, it is 30–100% better and 20–30% faster than the previous version.
Google DeepMind announced the results of a pilot deployment of the Gemini Robotics 2.5 model on active production lines at Mercedes-Benz facilities in Kecskemét (Hungary) and Sindelfingen (Germany). The humanoid robot Apollo 2 from Apptronik, performing a kitting task, sorted metal parts from crates and placed them into bins in the order needed for a specific vehicle on the line. According to Google DeepMind, this pilot achieved a 96% success rate, with the tasks running on a pair of models – Gemini Robotics ER monitored the progress of the work, while Gemini Robotics 2.5 controlled the robot's hands and arms. Apptronik CEO Jeff Cardenas said, according to the source, that the models improved significantly over several weeks of additional training and that the transition to production at Mercedes-Benz occurred with minimal loss of performance.
The Gemini Robotics 2.5 model is a vision-language-action model for controlling robots, building on an earlier version with full control of the robot's body. According to the company's own data, it was tested on more than 200 tasks, including serving food with tongs and pipetting liquids, and the company states that, compared to the previous version, it achieves a 30 to 100% higher success rate depending on the task type and performs tasks 20 to 30% faster. The model works with various types of robots, including the five-fingered humanoid robot Apollo 2 with 22 degrees of freedom and the Franka Duo platform with two-finger grippers. One of the demonstrated tasks was tying a bow, which, according to the source, shows improved manipulation of deformable objects.
To develop the model, the company used the Gemini 4 Argon language model as a simulation engine, which generates thousands of simulated practice runs from real video of a scene and creates a digital twin of the environment; combined with real training data, this is meant to allow robots to generalize more quickly to new scenes and objects. The company also published an open source safety benchmark called ASIMOV-Jailbreak on Hugging Face, which tests whether robotic models can be induced into dangerous actions through covertly formulated requests. According to the company, the Gemini 4 Argon model achieves 99.5% resistance to jailbreaking, compared to 82% for the previous version, Gemini Robotics ER 2; safe task completion, according to the company's own tests, improved by 33% near obstacles and by 43% near people.
Why it matters
This is one of the few published data points about the deployment of a humanoid robot with a VLA model on a real production line, rather than just in a lab or a demo. For companies considering robotic automation of repetitive manual tasks (sorting, kitting), it provides a concrete benchmark of success rate and speed, as well as information on how the model's performance changed during the transition from a test to a production environment. In addition, the publication of the open source ASIMOV-Jailbreak benchmark gives companies a tool to verify the safety of robotic models before deploying them in environments with people.
Release card
Gemini Robotics 2.5
Google DeepMind
- Inputs
- Vision-language-action model: it takes in image/video of the scene and language instructions as input, and generates movements of robotic hands and arms as output.
- Availability
- According to Google DeepMind, the model is being deployed with partners Agile, Apptronik, and Mercedes-Benz, including through pilot deployment on active production lines.
- Pilotní nasazení u firmy Mercedes-Benz (kitting robotem Apollo 2) 96% úspěšnost The proportion of metal parts successfully sorted and stored by the Apollo 2 robot on active production lines in Kecskemét and Sindelfingen.
- Srovnání úspěšnosti s předchozí verzí modelu (přes 200 úloh) o 30 až 100 % vyšší úspěšnost podle typu úlohy Indicates by how much task completion success rate improved compared to the previous version of Gemini Robotics, according to the company's own testing.
- Rychlost dokončení úloh ve srovnání s předchozí verzí o 20 až 30 % rychlejší Indicates how much faster the model completes tasks compared to the previous version of Gemini Robotics, according to the company's own testing.
- Bezpečné dokončení úkolu v blízkosti překážek zlepšení o 33 % Indicates by how much safe task completion improved, according to the company's own tests, when the robot moves near obstacles.
- Bezpečné dokončení úkolu v blízkosti lidí zlepšení o 43 % Indicates by how much safe task completion improved, according to the company's own tests, when the robot moves near people.
- Sorting and kitting metal parts on a production line (tested with the Apollo 2 robot at Mercedes-Benz)
- Serving food with tongs and pipetting liquids in laboratory tasks
- Manipulating deformable objects, such as tying a bow
Google DeepMind compares the model to its own previous version of Gemini Robotics, against which it achieves, depending on the task type, a 30 to 100% higher success rate and completes tasks 20 to 30% faster.
The card summarizes information from the article and any dated corrections, with a link to the original source. It is not our assessment of the model. It does not yet have a dedicated editorial profile. Model selection and other announcements →
What was added since the original report
Verified updates
-
In the pilot at Mercedes-Benz, Gemini Robotics 2.5 achieved a 96% success rate in sorting metal parts; The pilot took place on active production lines in Hungary and Germany; The model is 30–100% better than the previous version depending on the task type; Tasks are performed 20–30% faster than before; Apollo 2 specifically sorted metal parts in serious production use
- In the pilot at Mercedes-Benz, Gemini Robotics 2.5 achieved a 96% success rate in sorting metal parts
- The pilot took place on active production lines in Hungary and Germany
- The model is 30–100% better than the previous version depending on the task type
- Tasks are performed 20–30% faster than before
- Apollo 2 specifically sorted metal parts in serious production use
-
Gemini Robotics 2.5 improved manipulation capabilities with a specific focus on deformable objects; The model was evaluated on more than 200 tasks; The humanoid robot Apollo 2 managed to tie a bow; Robots with the new version are already working in a Mercedes-Benz manufacturing facility; Google DeepMind announced the open source safety benchmark ASIMOV-jailbreak
- Gemini Robotics 2.5 improved manipulation capabilities with a specific focus on deformable objects
- The model was evaluated on more than 200 tasks
- The humanoid robot Apollo 2 managed to tie a bow
- Robots with the new version are already working in a Mercedes-Benz manufacturing facility
- Google DeepMind announced the open source safety benchmark ASIMOV-jailbreak
Relevant practical impact
What this means
For a business
For manufacturing companies with manual tasks such as kitting and parts sorting, the pilot provides concrete data on the deployability of humanoid robots in real production, including information on the minimal loss of performance when transitioning from a test environment to production.
ProcessesCheck the original
Event sources
confirmed by 2 independent sources · 3 publishers, 2 independent. We count feeds from the same owner only once.