Skip to content
context Regulation and law

AI Now Institute expert: the positioning of Anthropic and other AI companies in response to regulatory pressure

only one source so far

Amba Kak of AI Now Institute says that growing opposition to data centers has shifted sentiment in favor of AI regulation and allowed companies such as Anthropic to cast themselves as experts on solving problems they helped create.

According to Amba Kak, co-director of AI Now Institute and a former AI adviser at the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC), more than a year of growing public opposition to the construction of data centers has brought about a fundamental shift in perceptions of the AI sector. She says the “pro-AI-regulation” stance has become the prevailing norm, while open support for the AI industry is now perceived as a toxic label.

Kak further stated that this change in sentiment has allowed companies such as Anthropic to position themselves as the leading experts on addressing the concerns that regulation tackles – that is, problems that, in her words, these companies appear to have caused themselves or are best placed to prevent.

The source excerpt is limited to this comment and contains no further context on the broader topic from which the quote was taken. You can find details in the source article.

What changed

Why it matters

The comment shows that statements by AI companies on regulation cannot be taken solely as a neutral expert position – according to Kak, they are partly a matter of strategic positioning by companies that have themselves contributed to the concerns they are now helping to “address”. This is relevant to anyone following the public debate on AI regulation and assessing the credibility of statements by individual companies.

Two audiences, two different impacts

What this means

01

For individuals

When following statements by AI companies on regulation, it is worth remembering that their role as an “expert on addressing concerns” may be part of strategic PR positioning, rather than simply independent expertise.

What to do View statements by AI companies on regulation critically, keeping their strategic interest in that position in mind.
More practical updates →
02

For a business

According to Kak, public perception has turned against open support for the AI industry, while the “pro-regulation” position has become the norm – companies in the sector should adapt their communication and regulatory strategy to this shift.

Risks and compliance
What to decide Take the shift in public sentiment toward support for AI regulation into account when formulating your own communication and regulatory strategy.
More business impacts →
AI regulation Anthropic data centers

Check the original

Event sources

only one source so far · 1 publisher, 1 independent. We count feeds from the same owner only once.

1
AI Now Institute research source · first detected Why this AI doomsday warning from former Anthropic researcher broke through